The decisions government take in response to the
coronavirus are in good faith and not meant to do harm. This is according to
President Cyril Ramaphosa who, in his weekly newsletter, responded to the
growing criticism of government’s regulations, some of which have been
challenged in court.
He said the government welcomed the constructive criticism
which enriched public debate and gives a broader understanding of people’s
views.
“Just as government appreciates that most court applicants
are motivated by the common good, so too should we recognise that the decisions
taken by government are made in good faith and are meant to advance, and not to
harm, the interests of South Africans,” Ramaphosa wrote. “Our foremost priority
remains to save lives. Our every decision is informed by the need to advance
the rights to life and dignity as set out in our constitution.”
Some of the criticism the government received during the
lockdown were about what people can buy and not buy from clothing shops,
arresting citizens for trying to make a living and the brutality by law
enforcement officers, like the one which resulted in the death of Collins Khosa
in Alexandra, northern Johannesburg.
The DA and the Freedom Front-Plus have also both
challenged, in court, the “Draconian” regulations the government has enforced
since declaring the state of national disaster and subsequently lockdown almost
two months ago. In their separate court actions, the parties have called for
government to end the lockdown and are also challenging the National Disaster
Management Act which they argue gives the government too much unchecked power.
Ramaphosa said he could not stand in the way of anyone,
even as president, as it was their constitutional right to approach the courts
whenever they were dissatisfied with the government’s decisions. He said that
was one way of holding the government accountable. “While we would prefer to
avoid the need for any legal action against government, we should accept that
citizens who are unhappy with whatever action that government has decided on
implementing have a right to approach our courts for any form of relief they
seek. This is a normal tenet of a constitutional democracy and a perfectly
acceptable practice in a country founded on the rule of law,” Ramaphosa said.
“We have checks and balances in place to ensure that every
aspect of governance is able to withstand constitutional scrutiny. Where we are
found wanting, we will be held to account by our courts and, above all, by our
citizens. Besides our courts, our Chapter 9 institutions exist to advance the
rights of citizens, as do the bodies tasked with oversight over the law
enforcement agencies." Sowetan
0 comments:
Post a Comment