This comes after Mnangagwa, during a recent address to
Zimbabwean expatriates in Beijing, China, stated that he plans to step down
when his term ends in 2028.
President Mnangagwa was re-elected to a second and final
term in August 2023.
Despite this, some provincial party officials have
advocated for extending his rule until 2030.
However, the Zimbabwean Constitution, which came into
effect in 2013, clearly limits the presidency to two five-year terms, with no
provisions for extending this limit.
Section 91(2) of the Constitution disqualifies any
individual from serving as President if they have already held the office for
two terms, whether continuous or not. The section further clarifies that a
service exceeding three years is considered a full term.
During a discussion on the show This Morning on Asakhe, a
participant named Kay Kay criticised ZANU PF for focusing on the third-term
debate instead of fulfilling their election promises.
“The ruling party often accuses others of being perpetually
in campaign mode, but here they are doing exactly what they accuse others of,”
said Kay Kay.
“Instead of addressing the issues they promised to tackle,
they have dragged the entire country into a debate about a third term. It’s the
ruling party that brought this topic to the forefront, with statements and
chants about extending the presidency. From the interview, it seems the
President himself is becoming frustrated with these questions.”
Kay Kay further argued that President Mnangagwa should have
taken a stronger stance against the idea of a third term, which appears to have
little support outside of factional battles within ZANU PF.
He suggested that some party members are pushing this
agenda to protect their interests, fearing they might lose their positions or
advantages if Mnangagwa steps down.
“Some individuals believe that if Mnangagwa leaves, they
will lose their positions or the benefits they’ve gained,” Kay added. “This
internal struggle is now being taken to the national stage, distracting the
country from pressing development issues and necessary government
interventions. We have many citizens facing food insecurity and other critical
challenges, but instead, our attention has been diverted to this third-term
debate.”
Another participant, Walter, dismissed the third-term
discussion as a political manoeuvre designed to keep the opposition occupied.
“This is merely an internal ZANU PF contestation,
exacerbated by factionalism within the party,” Walter said. “However, the most
important aspect is where this discussion took place—China, one of Zimbabwe’s
major economic partners.”
2023 Presidential candidate Elisabeth Valerio also weighed
in on the issue via social media platform X, accusing ZANU PF of ignoring the
needs of the electorate.
“Mnangagwa seems to be employing a strategy of reverse
psychology, pretending to step down only to be ‘persuaded’ to stay on,” Valerio
wrote. “This charade is nothing more than a ploy to cling to power at all
costs. We’ve seen senior ZANU PF members endorsing a third term for Mnangagwa.
Zimbabwe should not be held hostage by a ruling party that lacks a coherent and
democratic succession plan. The citizens of Zimbabwe are not asking for a third
term; they are demanding effective governance and quality public service
delivery.”
However, not all opinions were critical. Another
participant found it refreshing to hear President Mnangagwa’s intention to step
down, noting that such admissions are rare in Zimbabwe.
“This is a significant moment for Zimbabwe. We’ve never had
a leader openly declare their intention to retire,” the participant said.
“Even the late Robert Mugabe couldn’t do that until the
very end. It’s encouraging to hear the Head of State affirm his commitment to
the Constitution. It’s not easy for anyone in a position of power to announce
their retirement, so this is a positive development for the country.” CITE
0 comments:
Post a Comment