
Zimbabwe, under former President Robert Mugabe, forcibly
took land from white farmers without compensation, incurring the wrath of the
West, who accused the former leader of human rights violations.
In 2016, former Finance minister Patrick Chinamasa said
government could issue Treasury Bills and impose a land levy to raise money to
pay evicted farmers.
But Land and Agriculture minister Perrance Shiri told the
National Assembly yesterday that the new farmers had to contribute towards the
land they acquired.
He was responding to a question by Zaka North MP Robson
Mavhenyengwa, who had asked him to explain if government was going to
compensate the former owners.
“It is true that new farmers have to contribute towards the
cost of improvement on the farms and that money is ultimately used for
compensation,” Shiri said.
But Binga North MP Prince Dubeko Sibanda asked Shiri to
explain the rationale behind the decision, as the land was expropriated by
government and the Constitution stipulates that the State was the one to pay
compensation.
Section 295(1) of the Constitution stipulates that
compensation for acquired agricultural land will be by done by the State.
“There were improvements done on the farms and the new
farmer is expropriating those improvements and quite a number of them now have
99-year leases and all new farmers are looking forward to that,” Shiri
responded.
“It makes common sense that the persons that directly
benefitted from the improvements compensate the farmers.”
Mutare Central MP Innocent Gonese (MDC Alliance) then
questioned why government, in the new dispensation, made a commitment to pay
compensation, but was now reneging.
Kambuzuma MP Willias Madzimure (MDC Alliance) asked Shiri
to explain why the maize producer prize was at $390 when the world over it was
$190.
He alleged some Zimbabwean bigwigs were ordering cheap
maize from Zambia and selling it at $390 to the Grain Marketing Board.
Shiri said he was not aware of the matter. Meanwhile,
Senate sat for a record 10 minutes, wasting taxpayers’ money again after only
three senators contributed to debate to the presidential speech. Newsday
0 comments:
Post a Comment