Senior government officials said options on the table for
Mnangagwa included appointing acting Supreme Court judges from the High Court
bench to preside over government’s appeal against the landmark ruling that
ended Malaba’s term over a week ago.
Three High Court judges ruled that attempts by the
president to extend the top judge’s term of office after he had reached the
retirement age of 70 were illegal.
The Standard is informed that the government is mulling
using the recently amended clause that gives Mnangagwa powers to handpick
judges to manipulate some High Court judges to preside over the matter.
The Judicial Service Commission (JSC), on the other hand,
has reportedly proposed the roping-in of three retired judges to preside over
government’s appeal against a High Court ruling suspending the extension of
Chief Justice Luke Malaba’s tenure with five more years.
Retired judges Justices George Smith, Vernanda Ziyambi and
Ahmed Ebrahim, who resigned in 2002 accusing the government of violating the
law, have reportedly been listed by the JSC for recommendation to Mnangagwa for
the tough assignment.
Well-placed government sources have disclosed that
Mnangagwa will use the carrot-and-stick on the judges to come up with a
favourable outcome on both the process and ruling.
“Government wants to appoint judges of the High Court as
Supreme Court judges in acting capacity,” a top government official claimed.
“The judges will be told that since the President can now
appoint Supreme Court judges, courtesy of the enactment of Constitutional
Amendment 2 into law, they (the High Court judges selected to preside over the
matter as Supreme Court judges) will be automatically elevated to the Supreme
Court bench.
“The plan is that they will be told that if Justice Malaba
does not come back, and as long as President Mnangagwa is in power, they will
never be promoted to the Supreme Court bench.”
But the problem, a legal expert with the government said,
will be that the judges will have to be appointed by the Acting Chief Justice,
Justice Elizabeth Gwaunza, who is a conflicted party in the matter.
The problem has been made worse because the JSC is also now
a respondent and therefore cannot pick judges or recommend to Mnangagwa those
who can preside over the matter.
The Chief Justice only appoints Constitutional Court judges
and is also responsible for appointing retired judges, according to section 166
(2).
Asked for a comment, Justice permanent secretary Virginia
Mabhiza said those were imaginations coming from people who think that the
country is in a constitutional crisis.
“This cannot be true,” Mabhiza said, reacting to the
appointment of High Court judges to the Supreme Court to hear the Malaba case. “I
believe it’s speculation based on the misconception that there is a
constitutional crisis.”
Advocate Tafadzwa Lancelot Mapuranga said it’s possible
that the government might appoint other judges of the High Court.
“You can’t sit in a matter which you are part of. That’s a
basic legal principle,” Mapuranga said.
“If your name appears, you can’t sit. However, there are
other legal technicalities which might arise in a few weeks. They might want to
appoint High Court judges to the Supreme Court to hear the matter, but not
necessarily those who are cited. Those still remain conflicted like the
substantive Supreme Court judges.”
No High Court judge was listed as respondents. Some legal
experts and Zanu PF apologists blamed Ziyambi and Mabhiza for creating the
crisis.
“The letter to extend the term limit came a day after the
Chief Justice had been retired by age, so it means, on the 15th and so the real
term to have been used was, the President has recalled Justice Malaba. You
don’t extend when one has already retired,” a Zanu PF official said.
The Standard is informed there has been pressure on
Mnangagwa to reassign Ziyambi after his attack on the Judiciary, which most
people said was childish and a way of trying to atone for his failures after
ill-advising Mnangagwa on the day to extend Justice Malaba’s term.
Well-placed sources also said there are very limited
chances that Justice Malaba will come back. They said most High Court judges
were opposed to his way of leadership that saw judges fall under surveillance
from magistrates who form the majority of the JSC, an insider said.
“Eight High Court judges were on notice and the judges,
both at the High Court and Supreme Court, are also against the former Chief
Justice’s decision to have all judgements submitted to him for review.”
The tribunal that is trying Justice Erica Ndewere to
determine her fitness for office heard that Justice Malaba interfered with the
work of judges.
The country was thrown into a constitutional crisis two
weeks ago after High Court judge Justice Happias Zhou delivered a ruling that
declared illegal Mnangagwa’s extension of Justice Malaba’s term.
The ruling triggered an outburst from Justice minister
Ziyambi, who attacked judges for allegedly being captured by foreign
governments, threatening “to poke the enemy in the eye”. Standard
0 comments:
Post a Comment