In April, Cabinet approved a revised phased implementation
and funding plan for the project, which would see the delivery of the first
10MW within six months from the date all conditions precedent would have been
met.
The two parties were on the verge of signing a restated
contract for Gwanda that would have enabled the power project to resume without
further delay.
A feasibility study was one of the conditions precedent
ahead of the commencement of the project, for which ZPC approved appointment of
Shanghai Electric Power Design Institute (SEPDI) to do the work.
“Further to the signing of the EPC contract (ref ZPC
304/2015) between ZPC and Intratrek/CHiNT technical partnership, wherein the
feasibility study is a condition precedent to the commencement of works and
after thorough consideration of your profile, work and methodology and
experience in similar projects, we are pleased to advise you of your
appointment as feasibility consultants for the above project,” ZPC said in a
letter to SEPDI in 2015.
SEPDI undertook the feasibility study at a cost of US$2,2
million, and after taking delivery of results of the technical investigation
confirming the possibility of the initiative, ZPC endorsed the study findings.
Intratrek argues that since it was ZPC who appointed SEPDI
in 2015, it would save money and time if SEPDI updates the existing feasibility
instead of having a new one. The Chinese company is understood to have agreed
to do the review work at no cost to Zesa.
SEPDI is a subsidiary of multibillion-dollar Chinese
conglomerate Power China, parent firm of Sinohydro, which undertook the 300MW
Kariba South extension and is now doing Hwange Power Station’s 600MW extension
project.
“ZPC previously appointed SEPDI in 2015 as the feasibility
study consultant for the project. ZPC carried out a due diligence exercise on
SEPDI, as evidenced by their letter . . . appointing SEPDI, they were fully
satisfied with their technical capacity and expertise,” Intratrek said.
However, ZPC, the power-generating arm of State power
utility Zesa, is demanding a fresh feasibility study to be carried out at its
expense, claiming that the old one, which was done five years ago, needed to be
freshened up as it might not be compatible with new technologies and
expectations.
“Due to the five-year lapse since the feasibility study
report of 2015, the change of technology in your (new) proposal and the new
funding structure, a feasibility study update is central to mitigation of risk
and success of the project.
“Both parties must see this exercise as important. The
review will confirm the project scope, price, bankability and importantly, will
identify risks and mitigation measures,” ZPC said.
ZPC said as a matter of policy, its parent firm, Zesa,
requires all projects to have a bankable feasibility study undertaken by an
independent consultant appointed by the power utility.
“This is consistent with best practice in project
management and a major recommendation of the PwC forensic audit of Zesa. It
will restore much-needed credibility to a project that has attracted extensive
public scrutiny.”
ZPC said this will enable it to raise the requisite project
finance, a precondition it claimed is demanded by most foreign lenders.
It is feared that doing a completely new study might not
only come with additional costs but further delay the project. In 2017, ZPC
lost a High Court case in which Intratrek Zimbabwe challenged the cancellation
of the contract for Gwanda over alleged implementation delays.
High Court judge Tawanda Chitapi declared the contract to
be valid and extant and ordered the parties to sit down and find common ground
for the project to proceed without further delay.
The latest deadlock over a fresh feasibility study might be
a fresh hurdle to the implementation of the key power project. Sunday Mail
0 comments:
Post a Comment