FIFA have turned down a request from the Sport and
Recreation Commission to use their power to remove the entire ZIFA leadership
from office and replace it with a normalisation committee to run domestic
football for a specified period.
FIFA said while they expect bodies like ZIFA to be fully
accountable and, if required, submit to the authorities all relevant
information regarding the use of public funds, they didn’t believe there was
need for the removal of Felton Kamambo’s ZIFA leadership.
Should the ZIFA leadership be replaced by an interim
committee, at the instigation of the SRC and the Youth, Sport, Arts and
Recreation Ministry, FIFA said that would be deemed to be interference in the
affairs of the association. And, it could result in ZIFA’s suspension from
FIFA, with the country’s national teams barred from international competitions.
The SRC said they had noted FIFA’s response and an
appropriate response would have given.
‘‘FIFA response is noted. SRC and related agencies will tender
appropriate responses shortly re – allegations relating to public funds and
flouting of laws,’’ the SRC said on their Twitter account.
Article (8) (2) of the General Provisions of the FIFA
Statutes empower the world football governing body to act and remove national
football controlling bodies and replace them with normalisation committees.
‘‘Executive bodies of member associations may, under
exceptional circumstances, be removed from office by the (FIFA) Council in
consultation with the relevant confederation and replaced by a normalisation
committee for a specific period of time.’’
But, FIFA turned down the request by the SRC in a letter
sent earlier this month, to replace the entire ZIFA board with a normalisation
committee.
Some of the principal figures on the ZIFA board are acting
vice-president, Philemon Machana, and executive committee members, Farai Jere,
the Premier Soccer League chairman, Sugar Chagonda, Bryton Malandule and Barbra
Chikosi, the women football boss. Apparently, the SRC request also coincided
with a visit to this country by FIFA central review auditors who were looking
at the ZIFA financial transactions.
SRC chairman, Gerald Mlotshwa, announced two weeks ago
that, although they had the authority to remove part, or the entire ZIFA
leadership from office, they had written to FIFA to provide the intervention by
replacing the board led by Kamambo which came into power last December.
‘‘The SRC has, of today, this 15th August 2019, written to
the Secretary-General of FIFA requesting that FIFA invoke Article (8) (2) of
the General Provisions of the FIFA Statutes to remove from office the entire
Zimbabwe Football Association (ZIFA) Board and to replace it with a
normalisation committee,’’ Mlotshwa’s statement read.
‘‘The SRC has reserved its right, in terms of the same
correspondence, to act in terms of Section 30 of the SRC Act and suspend the
entire board itself.’’
The Sports Commission believed according to Section 30 (1)
(c) of the Sports and Recreation Act, ZIFA had conducted itself in a manner
which was against the national interest of sport.
This was related to FIFA funds, which have been pumped into
ZIFA for the development of the game, the controversies related to the
Warriors’ at the last AFCON finals and the negativity that continues to stalk
the Mighty Warriors.
The Sports Commission also felt they were not given the
responses they required from ZIFA to explain how funds from FIFA could have
ended changing bank accounts and if such a conduct did not consist, on face
value, gross incompetence in the discharge of duties for such a national
association.
They had written to ZIFA on July 3 this year requesting
that they be provided with comprehensive answers to a number of allegations
that had emerged and the association, in response, asked for an extension of
the deadline and then didn’t supply the required information.
However, FIFA, through their deputy secretary general
(administration), Alasdair Bell, yesterday advised the Sports Commission the
conditions prevailing at ZIFA did not warrant an intervention that would see
the board being disbanded and replaced by a normalisation committee.
The letter was written to Mlotshwa and copied to CAF and
ZIFA.
‘‘We refer to your letter dated 14 August 2019, through
which you requested FIFA to appoint a normalisation committee for the Zimbabwe
Football Association (ZIFA), namely because of allegations of financial
mismanagement,’’ Bell wrote.
‘‘At the outset we would like to underline that FIFA
encourages close cooperative relations between its member associations and
national governments.
‘‘In addition, we expect our member associations to be
fully accountable for and, if required, submit to the authorities all relevant
information regarding the use of public funds, if any are provided, in line
with the pertinent national legislation.
‘‘Regarding funding provided by FIFA, we would like to
inform you that every member association receiving FIFA Forward development
funds, including ZIFA, is subject to rigorous controls in the use of these
funds.
‘‘This includes an annual central audit review which is
undertaken by an independent professional auditor appointed by FIFA. Adverse
findings noted by the auditors are reported to the FIFA Audit and Compliance
Committee and may result in a restriction or even suspension of funding.
‘‘Furthermore, in the event of any suspicion of the misuse
of funds, the matter is referred to the competent FIFA judicial body. As a
consequence of the above, we deem that the conditions for setting up a
normalisation committee for ZIFA in line with Art. 8 par. 2 of the FIFA
Statutes are not fulfilled.’’
FIFA said they expect ZIFA to manage their affairs
independent of third parties.
‘‘In this context, we must remind you about the contents of
Art. 14 par. 1 let. (i) and Art. 19 par. 1 of the FIFA Statutes, which
stipulate that all member associations are obliged to manage their affairs
independently and without undue influence from third parties,’’ Bell wrote.
‘‘Therefore, should the Minister of Youth, Sport, Arts
& Recreation of Zimbabwe, upon recommendation of the Sports and Recreation
Committee (SRC), decide to appoint an interim committee to administer the
affairs of ZIFA, it would be considered undue influence in the sense of the
FIFA Statutes.
‘‘Consequently, the matter would be presented to the
relevant FIFA bodies for consideration and possible action, which may include
the suspension of ZIFA.
‘‘Finally, we would like to inform you that FIFA is engaged
in assisting ZIFA with its debt servicing strategy. In this regard, we would
like to underline that we remain at the authorities’ disposal to discuss, if
possible, joint efforts to address ZIFA’s current financial situation.’’ Herald
0 comments:
Post a Comment