DailyNews Editor Gift Phiri sits down for a wide-ranging
interview with Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition spokesperson and director Tabani
Moyo about last week’s shutdown. Find below excerpts of the interview.
Q: What is your
assessment of the Shutdown in terms of its impact?
A: The shutdown, in my own assessment, was a tipping point
of a citizen’s boiling tempers. It expressed a clear pointer that Zimbabwe can
and or should do with a process of opening up for dialogue and debate around
issues that affect itself structurally, at the economic levels and those things
which define her very existence at political levels.
In the absence of a people holding regular in-depth debates
and national dialogue, when given a chance, as they did in the three days under
review, chances are that tempers and emotions will explode beyond expected
proportions. If the government is responsive, it should take this as an
opportunity to attend to the very reasons that have frustrated and angered the
peoples of Zimbabwe, especially the current system of governance which has seen
them poorer.
Q: Do you think it was a success?
A: This is rather a problematic question, when it is
directed to the Coalition, which was more of a solidarity partner to the
Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU), which called for the shutdown. Our
member, the ZCTU, probably set the objectives and are in a position to better
quantify and qualify the success indicators of the action.
However, from a solidarity point of view, and general point
of view, the major towns were successfully shut down in the three-day period
under review.
Our position regarding the action is a public manner in as
far as we stand in solidarity with the organisers of peaceful and non-violent
protest actions to the comatose economic situation in the country as defined by
a run-away inflationary regime, failing capacity for industry and manufacturing
industries, erosion of income of the citizens due to the multiple pricing
regime, pegged to the United States dollar and a failing health education,
service delivery and other social services nets for the bulk of the peoples of
Zimbabwe.
It was, however, deplorable that some elements then took
the opportunity to vandalise property, loot products in retail shops among
other “isms”.
The Coalition went on to issue a strong statement against
the State’s heavy-handed response to the protests, including the use of live
ammunition through the deployed soldiers and police details.
This was coming hot on the
heels of the Motlanthe Commission report on the August 1, extra-judicial
killings of six civilians by the army. Sadly, innocent souls were lost due to
such heavy-handed approaches by the State and many left injured.
Q: Government buckled under pressure and awarded a
cushioning allowance and refund of excise duty on fuel to registered firms. Can
this be touted as a breakthrough?
A: That is a tokenism approach to the complex structural
economic challenges affecting the country which requires a holistic approach
rather than knee-jerk interventions. It does not make economic sense for
example that the government effects a 100 percent increase in fuel, while on
the same footing increase the salaries of doctors by 10 percent. This points to
an economy experiencing multiple dislocations, which are slowly grinding the
centre to a halt.
Our economy is broken, there is need to invest in
manufacturing and industry, modernise our agriculture, re-position our
institution of higher learning into modern-day machinery of innovations and
inventions among others.
Q: You have been accused of organising this shutdown through
meetings you allegedly held at Wild Geese Lodge. It’s alleged you later
convened another meeting in Belvedere. Is this correct?
A: The coalition has already pronounced itself on this
matter with clarity. Crisis Coalition held a one-day meeting on December 3 to
discuss the role of CSO (civil society organisations) in transitional justice
and setting the framework for national dialogue. From the 4th to the 6th, the
organisation was on a strategy reflection meeting which feeds towards its
strategic plan document.
This is done annually, around the same time since our
formation as an organisation. The organisation did not hold any meeting in
Belvedere, we only read it in the State-owned newspapers such as The Herald and
the Chronicle and recently in statements by the government. I have been
repeating this reality, but out of malice, the State media and the government
are ignoring these clear facts.
Q: What did your meetings exactly discuss? May you go into
detail?
A: As outlined above, the first day it was about
transitional justice and taking steps towards defining the framework for
national dialogue. The last three days were strategic planning reflections,
which we traditionally engage in outside elective general meetings.
There is nothing criminal for organisations, registered in
the country, to regularly hold internal meetings, as this is provided by the
Constitution of the Republic. One of the resolutions of the meeting was that we
should proceed to hold a National People’s Convention (NPC) which draws from
the women’s movement, students, churches, media, business, farmers and people
living with disabilities so that they make their key demands on the issues that
form the agenda for a national dialogue process.
These are the partial remedies to issues confronting and
knocking our socio-political and economic order at the moment, which if
supported by the government, will be a step towards lasting solutions. Sadly,
such actions and undertakings are demonised and branded subversion. The
government should never forget that the vision of the Coalition is to see a
democratic country.
Q: Did you co-ordinate with ZCTU and #ThisFlag in these
protests?
A: You are actually identifying the organisers in your
questioning! In our entire deliberations in early December, we never planned of
organising or co-ordinating protests. The so-called January meeting, was
definitely not a meeting of the Coalition.
The only way to know who the actual conveners of the
so-called Belvedere meeting is the government, reverting back to its notes and
making a public clarification on how it erroneously attributed another
organisation’s meeting to the Coalition.
The State might just as well apportion blame to the
Coalition for the clumsy way they handled the doctors’ strike. The teachers
were also on strike recently, but rather the government has opted for the easy
route of blame-shifting rather than attending to the demands of the citizens.
Furthermore,
evidence before the courts shows that actually members of the ruling party were
also implicated in the burning and destruction of State property such as a
Zupco bus and (former Information minister Webster) Shamu’s service station.
These are stubborn facts at hand which could easily be verified before going on
a propaganda overdrive, which can be an embarrassment to the government that
wants to be taken seriously.
In essence, the statement produced by the ruling party,
through its spokesperson Simon Khaya Moyo, was more rational and firmer
compared to the one produced by the State, which attributes the source of the
protects as the Crisis Coalition meeting in December. In his response to the
shutdown, SK Moyo attributed the protests to the failing economy and outlined
that the citizens were justified to protest, in as far as they were doing it in
a peaceful manner.
Q: Do you have any association with so-called Democratic
Resistance Committee and The Vanguard, both alleged MDC outfits?
A: The Crisis Coalition is a conglomeration of 82 civic
organisations which are working in the areas of governance and democracy. We
are not affiliated to any political party. Again, the government is mixing up
its intelligence. We are not in any way working or have any knowledge on the
workings of the MDC structures.
Q: What’s your comment on the high-handedness with which
the State put down the protests, five said to have been killed, scores shot,
and many netted in a dragnet arrest after door-to-door raids?
A: We condemn in the strongest of terms the heavy-handed
approach by government in dealing with the demonstrators. The move by the
government to deploy armed police and soldiers against citizens exercising
their democratic right to protests should be condemned in the strongest of
terms.
It has become predictable that the government has a reflex
of being disproportionate in their response to citizens expressing their views.
The use of live ammunition is dangerously gaining traction
in this country against regional and international norms of handling riotous
situations. The Coalition expresses its heartfelt condolences to those who lost
their loved ones out of this rather deplorable approach in handling crowds.
Q: Do you think the grievances are genuine, given that this
was all sparked by an over 100 percent hike in the price of fuel?
A: As I noted in my introductory remarks, Zimbabwe has been
bottling up for a long time, without finding the venting point. The fuel
increases are just but a trigger moment. Remember, we are heavily taxed; cost
of living is sky-rocketing with the three-tier pricing mechanism wreaking havoc
in the economy; failing health system; challenges with accessing clean water
and poor service delivery among other key factors that led to the citizens to
shut down the country.
Q: Zanu PF has characterised all this as “economic
sabotage.” Do you share that opinion?
A: That’s an unfortunate pronouncement, which entails that
the party is not a listening party which does not have mechanisms to absorb
feedback from its citizens. If the citizens are no-longer affording basic
commodities and services they have the right to petition their government.
Q: How do you think this unrest can be resolved given that
talks under the tripartite negotiating forum have dismally failed?
A: As the Coalition, we held our December 3, 2018 meeting
with the hope that we stimulate debate on a framework for national dialogues.
You saw the results for such proactive thinking! That we are saboteurs, for
daring to think ahead. An inclusive national dialogue process among all key
stakeholders is the panacea to this crisis at hand, rather than scapegoating
and stocking temperature on narrow interest positions.
Q: And labour is pushing for US dollar salaries. Is this
doable?
A: The economy is now an elite economy, which is “rated” at
the going USD value for every transaction. This entails that we are valuing our
goods and services at USD value. The major shift to avoid an elite USD rated
economy, is to stock up gold reserves and introduce a gold-backed currency and
the discipline to maintain the gold reserves.
Q: It seems this is a currency problem. What do you suggest
on the currency front, dollarisation, Rand Monetary Union, demonetising bond
notes?
A: It is not the currency crisis alone, but failing
production. We are not producing to earn the money. Hence the need to go all
the way in investment on manufacturing and industrial capacity utilisation,
value adding our products in agriculture and mining as the major foreign
currency earners. When you have economic growth in real terms, it creates jobs
and opportunities for the economy to sustain itself and leap into orbits of
sustainable growth.
Q: How is your conglomeration of civil society groups
helping in all this?
A: We are a think-tank geared towards stimulating
conversations around the national economy, unlocking the political gridlock
through a national dialogue policy framework. In addition, we strongly believe
that Zimbabwe has various capabilities at resource level, human capital and
environmental factors for success, what is required is agile, innovative and
competitive leadership to define a path that unites the country in re-building
bottom up.
Q: Do you believe there is a political solution?
A: The politics of the country defines the economy and
social bearings of the country. If the politics is responsive, through
visionary leadership, everything else falls into its correct place. Daily News
0 comments:
Post a Comment